Bringing the current news and articles
about Armageddon to you. This page will be updated often so
please check back with Armageddon News often to stay on top of
the news of interest to those of you who are watching the
signs of the end times as well as Armageddon at the end of the
Tribulation.
List of United
Nations General Assembly Resolutions concerning Israel
From
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is a list of United
Nations resolutions that concern Israel
and bordering states such as Lebanon.
The Human
Rights Council has passed more resolutions
condemning Israel than it has all other states combined.[1]
From 1967 to 1989 the UN
Security Council passed 131 resolutions
directly addressing the Arab–Israeli
conflict. In early Security Council practice,
resolutions did not directly invoke Chapter
VII. They made an explicit determination of a
threat, breach of the peace, or act of aggression, and
ordered an action in accordance with Article 39 or 40.
Resolution 54 determined that a threat to peace existed
within the meaning of Article 39 of the Charter,
reiterated the need for a truce, and ordered a
cease-fire pursuant to Article 40 of the Charter.
Although the phrase "Acting under Chapter VII"
was never mentioned as the basis for the action taken,
the chapter's authority was being used.[2]
The United
Nations General Assembly has adopted a number of
resolutions saying that the strategic relationship with
the United States encourages Israel to pursue aggressive
and expansionist policies and practices.[3]
The 9th Emergency Session of the General Assembly was
convened at the request of the Security Council when the
United States blocked efforts to adopt sanctions against
Israel.[4]
The United States responded to the frequent criticism
from UN organs by adopting the Negroponte
doctrine.
This resolution called for the division of
Palestine into two states, one Jewish, the other
Arab, with an "international regime" to
administer Jerusalem.
The resolution spelled out, in detail, the
boundaries for the two states. The Jewish state
was to receive 56% of Mandate Palestine, an area
which contained a population of 498,000 Jews and
407,000 Arabs, according to a United Nations report
issued at the time. The Arab state would contain
725,000 Arabs and 10,000 Jews.
Jerusalem, which would be under the purview of
the United Nations, had a population of 100,000 Jews
and 105,000 Arabs.
The resolution required both states to protect
the rights of minorities, and to ensure free access
to holy sites.
Both states were also required to establish an
"Economic Union of Palestine," which would
create, among other things, a common currency and a
customs union.
This resolution was passed near the end of the
1948 Arab-Israeli war, and after the events of the nakba
("catastrophe"), the expulsion of more
than 700,000 Palestinians from their homes.
The most significant aspect of this resolution is
article 11, which enshrines a right of return for
Palestinian refugees:
The General Assembly... resolves that the
refugees wishing to return to their homes and live
at peace with their neighbours should be permitted
to do so at the earliest practicable date, and
that compensation should be paid for the property
of those choosing not to return and for loss of or
damage to property which, under principles of
international law or in equity, should be made
good by the Governments or authorities
responsible.
Israel insists that the resolution does not
guarantee a right of return, since it states that
refugees merely "should be permitted" to
return.
Other provisions of resolution 194 call for a
demilitarised city of Jerusalem, and for "all
residents of Palestine" to have free access to
the city.
This resolution was the result of the United
Nations' first-ever emergency session during the
Suez Crisis in November 1956.
Resolution 1001 created the United Nations
Emergency Force, the international peacekeeping body
stationed on Sinai until it was expelled by the
Egyptian government before the Six-Day War. (A
successor to UNEF was created following the 1973
war.)
The first troops arrived on Sinai eight days
later, and UNEF reached its full complement of 6,000
troops by February 1957. Troops were drawn from 11
countries, with several others providing logistical
support.
This resolution followed several other
Suez-related resolutions, including 997, which
called for a cease-fire and the withdrawal of troops
to the 1949 armistice lines.
This resolution was adopted following the Six-Day
War in 1967 between Israel, Egypt, Jordan and Syria.
Israel had significantly expanded its territory
by the end of the war, seizing control of the Sinai
Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, East
Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.
Resolution 242 called for the "withdrawal of
Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the
recent conflict." This is generally interpreted
as a demand for Israel to withdraw from all occupied
territory, though Israel has insisted that a partial
withdrawal is acceptable under the wording (because
it does not state "all territories").
The resolution further links Israel's withdrawal
to peace with its neighbours:
Termination of all claims or states of
belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement
of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and
political independence of every State in the area
and their right to live in peace...
In other words, this resolution laid the
foundation for the "land for peace"
formula, which has been at the heart of the
so-called "peace process" ever since.
This resolution was passed near the end of the
October 1973 war between Israel and a coalition of
Arab states (led by Egypt and Syria).
It is essentially just a reaffirmation of
resolution 242: It calls for all sides to respect a
cease-fire within 12 hours, and then urges them to
"start immediately after the cease-fire the
implementation of Security Council resolution 242 in
all of its parts."
The resolution was passed by a 14-0 vote, with
one member, China, abstaining.
The cease-fire quickly unraveled, though, in part
because US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger urged
the Israeli government to advance its positions in
the hours before the truce took effect.
The Security Council would pass two more
resolutions, 339 and 340, over the next three days;
the latter finally resulted in a lasting cease-fire.
This resolution, titled "Elimination of all
forms of racial discrimination," described
Zionist ideology as racist.
It mentioned, among other things, a 1975
conference of the Organisation of African Unity (a
precursor to the African Union), which compared
Zionism to South African apartheid:
... "the racist regime in occupied
Palestine and the racist regime in Zimbabwe and
South Africa have a common imperialist origin,
forming a whole and having the same racist
structure and being organically linked in their
policy aimed at repression of the dignity and
integrity of the human being."
The resolution went on to declare Zionism "a
form of racism and racial discrimination."
It passed in the General Assembly by a 72-35
vote, with 32 countries abstaining. The Israeli
ambassador described the resolution as
"anti-Semitic."
It would eventually become the only General
Assembly resolution to be revoked. Israel demanded
that the UN revoke 3379 before it would agree to
participate in the Madrid Conference; the UN did so
with resolution 4686, which was approved in December
1991.
The Security Council approved this resolution
five days after the start of "Operation Litani,"
Israel's 1978 invasion of southern Lebanon.
The invasion was aimed at destroying Palestine
Liberation Organisation (PLO) camps south of the
Litani River. As many as 2,000 Lebanese civilians
were killed, and tens of thousands of more
displaced, during the week-long incursion.
Resolution 425 called for an immediate Israeli
withdrawal from Southern Lebanon.
The resolution also established a "United
Nations interim force for Southern Lebanon" (UNIFIL),
a multinational force tasked with keeping the peace.
Though dubbed an "interim force," UNIFIL
still exists 33 years later; its mandate is renewed
annually by the Security Council.
The Israeli army withdrew on March 21, though it
would invade southern Lebanon again four years
later. It also continued to operate for decades
through proxy fighters in the South Lebanon Army.
Resolution 465: Settlements and the Geneva
Conventions
This resolution deals primarily with the rights
of Palestinians living in the occupied territories.
It "affirms once more" that the Fourth
Geneva Convention, which requires that civilians be
protected during wartime, applies "to the Arab
territories occupied by Israel since 1967."
And it criticises the Israeli policy of building
Jewish settlements on occupied Palestinian land.
Resolution 465 also mentioned the case of Fahd
Qawasma, the mayor of Hebron, who was invited to
testify before the committee. Israel barred him from
traveling to New York.
"The Security Council… strongly
deplores the decision of Israel to prohibit the
free travel of [the mayor] in order to appear
before the Security Council."
This resolution was partly a follow-up to resolution
446, passed by the Security Council the
preceding year, which declared Israeli settlements
"have no legal validity and constitute a
serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive,
just and lasting peace in the Middle East."
Resolution 681 once again calls on Israel to
apply the Fourth Geneva Convention to Palestinians
in the occupied territories.
The resolution itself mentions two prior
resolutions, 672 and 673, which deal with the
October 1990 violence at Al-Aqsa Mosque in
Jerusalem. Palestinians armed only with stones were
fired upon by Israeli police; more than 20
Palestinians were killed, and more than 150 injured.
Resolution 672 condemned the violence; resolution
673 criticised Israel's decision to bar a United
Nations fact-finding mission from entering the
country.
Also notable is a "presidential
statement" issued along with the resolution:
The members of the Security Council
reaffirm their determination to support an active
negotiating process in which all relevant parties
would participate leading to a comprehensive, just
and lasting peace to the Arab-Israeli conflict. In
this context they agree that an international
conference should facilitate efforts to achieve a
negotiated settlement.
The Madrid Conference the following year was the
first major face-to-face negotiation between Israel,
the Palestinians, and neighbouring Arab countries.